In an auditorium in Belcourt, North Dakota, on a chilly October day in 1932, Robert Bruce and his fellow tribal citizens held the political fate of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians in their hands. Bruce, and the others, had been asked to adopt a tribal constitution, but he was unhappy with the document, as it limited tribal governmental authority. However, white authorities told the tribal nation that the proposed constitution was a necessary step in bringing a lawsuit against the federal government over a long-standing land dispute. Bruce's choice, and the choice of his fellow citizens, has shaped tribal governance on the reservation ever since that fateful day.
In this book, Keith Richotte Jr. offers a critical examination of one tribal nation's decision to adopt a constitution. By asking why the citizens of Turtle Mountain voted to adopt the document despite perceived flaws, he confronts assumptions about how tribal constitutions came to be, reexamines the status of tribal governments in the present, and offers a fresh set of questions as we look to the future of governance in Native America and beyond.
| Sobre o Livro |
O livro investiga um momento decisivo na história da governança tribal dos Chippewa em Turtle Mountain. Analisa a complexa escolha política de adotar uma constituição em 1932, revelando as tensões entre autoridades indígenas e governamentais. Richotte examina criticamente os processos de formação constitucional em comunidades nativas, questionando narrativas tradicionais sobre autonomia e representação política. A obra oferece uma perspectiva inovadora sobre os mecanismos de poder nas relações entre povos indígenas e Estado. O estudo destaca as estratégias de resistência e negociação dos cidadãos da nação Turtle Mountain diante de pressões externas. Explora como decisões políticas locais podem transformar profundamente as estruturas de governança indígena.
|