{"title":"Paideia Press","description":null,"products":[{"product_id":"a-new-critique-of-theoretical-thought-vol-4","title":"A New Critique of Theoretical Thought, Vol. 4","description":"\u003cp\u003e\"Highly esteemed Mr. Dooyeweerd: yours is the great merit to have seen that today we can no longer philosophize, as was still possible in the so-called modern era, without answering the question - or at least raising it - in what way philosophy and Christianity relate to each other. Today we know all too well that all philosophizing takes place against the background of a culture that in essential respects is determined by its religion, even in its anti-religious voices and moods or in its seemingly indifferent discussions and argumentation. The period in which philosophy and religion marched separately (or claimed that they could and should do so) is gone.\"\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRichard Kroner, Professor of Philosophy, University of Kiel\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Paideia Press","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":53479862370671,"sku":"9780888152985","price":132.02,"currency_code":"BRL","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0921\/9384\/9711\/files\/0888152981.jpg?v=1789502714"},{"product_id":"reformation-scholasticism","title":"Reformation \u0026 Scholasticism","description":"\u003cp\u003eThis is the first Volume of an encompassing study of the problem of Reformation and Scholasticism in philosophy, focused on Greek philosophy up to and including Plato. Whereas Plato and Aristotle employed the term dialectic within the context of the human ability to discern or to infer, Dooyeweerd uses it to designate the irreconcilable tension between the two opposing poles of the basic motive of Greek thought. He argues that the kind of dialectic found on the level of ultimate commitments, preferably designated by him as a basic motive or ground motive, not only transcends the realm of logical-analytical thinking, but at the same time also informs and directs it. According to him, the basic motive of matter and form, directing the entire development of Greek philosophy, is broken apart by an inherent dialectic. The only option is to assign primacy either to the matter pole (the initial development of Greek philosophy) or the form pole (since Anaxagoras and culminating in the thought of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle), without being able to obtain a higher synthesis and encompassing both. In this encompassing and penetrating work, Dooyeweerd demonstrates why the historian of philosophy should always aim at understanding each epoch in the history of philosophy in terms of its own deepest motivation and direction-giving ground motive.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Paideia Press","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":53479915028847,"sku":"9780888153043","price":138.01,"currency_code":"BRL","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0921\/9384\/9711\/files\/088815304X.jpg?v=1789503383"}],"url":"https:\/\/internacional.umlivro.com.br\/collections\/paideia-press.oembed","provider":"UmLivro Internacional","version":"1.0","type":"link"}